@Calen
More info would be nice in what exactly they mean, A C64 design for 2003? (not good for CommodoreOne) or just relaunching the classic in it's original form? (seems silly)
Isn't the C=1 between those two? More powerfull and configurable than a C64, but not modern enough to be a primary computer for 2003?
@kubyx
Who said 1998? Commodore.nl has been around since 1996 with the same message since around 2000
I had a quick look on the Wayback machine, and the current site has been exactly the same since 2001 :-)
