Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Need SERIOUS help with OS3.9  (Read 3008 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline LPTopic starter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2003
  • Posts: 358
    • Show all replies
    • http://bailout.dk
Need SERIOUS help with OS3.9
« on: May 01, 2003, 12:26:21 AM »
My Workbench is really bugging me at the time...

Workbench loads fine untill a sertain point were I get this message in a requester:

"
ramlib
program failed at 8000000B
"

The only option is to freeze it or reboot...

What do I do? I get the message approx. 2 times on every startup before it somehow doesn't fail...

HELP!
 

Offline LPTopic starter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2003
  • Posts: 358
    • Show all replies
    • http://bailout.dk
Re: Need SERIOUS help with OS3.9
« Reply #1 on: May 01, 2003, 12:44:44 AM »
Nope... 68060

What does ramlib do?
 

Offline LPTopic starter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2003
  • Posts: 358
    • Show all replies
    • http://bailout.dk
Re: Need SERIOUS help with OS3.9
« Reply #2 on: May 01, 2003, 01:43:22 AM »
Thanks to all of you guys for helping me out!!!
Keep posting though if these suggestions doesn't work I'll need more good ideas... :-)

Cheers!
 

Offline LPTopic starter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2003
  • Posts: 358
    • Show all replies
    • http://bailout.dk
Re: Need SERIOUS help with OS3.9
« Reply #3 on: May 01, 2003, 02:33:54 PM »
thanks guys!

I'm not sure if it works now but I haven't had any proplems for the past 24 hours...
 

Offline LPTopic starter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2003
  • Posts: 358
    • Show all replies
    • http://bailout.dk
Re: Need SERIOUS help with OS3.9
« Reply #4 on: May 04, 2003, 01:35:20 PM »
Hmm... Yeah, well I tried using StackAttack... That didn't solve the problem I'm afraid... Had a failure this morning.

Just to get it sorted out;

I get that message when I boot from cold, and rarely between the boots I do after the machine is started...

I'll try the NOCACHE, CPU CACHE thing now...