B00tDisk wrote:
It never fails to tickle me pink to read reports of how BAWWWWWWWWFUL windows is from users who have machines that are slow, give no background information on how they're maintained, don't give any system specs beyond CPU (including desktop configuration, etc. etc.) and then tout Amiga (or mac or linux) systems as being so, so much better.
Now tell me about browsing the web on your 030 A1200, as someone else asked. I'm sure that's a scintillating experience.
I've got a windows box. It's got Windows Vista 64 SP1 and it runs quite flawlessly. It's quite quick too and I like using it.
I've also got a macbook Pro, running MAC OS X Leopard and it's quite good.
I've also got a Linux box, running on a decent PC setup. It's quite amazing how slick Ubuntu can be.
I've also got an Amiga 4000 with CyberstormPPC, running Amiga OS 4.0 classic. It runs like crap. Going from 3.9 - 4.0 was the worst thing I ever did.
