Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Why no updates for OWB on AmigaOS 4.1  (Read 4388 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline vox

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2011
  • Posts: 862
    • Show all replies
    • http://anticusa.wordpress.com
Re: Why no updates for OWB on AmigaOS 4.1
« on: September 03, 2013, 07:09:44 PM »
Quote from: OlafS3;746898
Besides that the word "pissed" is a little too often for my taste... There are some fundamental questions... who does it? The number of volunteers in the amiga-community (with enough knowledge) is very limited (or better not-existing). The most who have experience already have their projects. So he (the user) does a good job to "piss-off kas1e". Who organizes it then? This user? I would predict that he does not do it (just requesting/expecting). Then there are other related problems. I read a discussion on amigans where kas1e explained some of the problems. OWB is "opensource" but somehow not. The sources are in development in a closed area where noone else can commit. That means that every sourcechange (for AROS/AmigaOS) has to be redone every time a new version is ported. People tend to forget so basically it all has to be redone every time (a lot of wasted time and energy). The second problem is important components like HTML5 player are not part of OWB but closed source components of MorphOS. Of course the GUI is MUI4 and that is closed source too. So every port of OWB is not only older than the actual/newest one, it is also worse. Someone discussed with me that he would prefer a Ambient port to Magellan for AROS. Here would the same happen as now with OWB.

For people interested to read: http://www.amigans.net/modules/xforum/viewtopic.php?topic_id=5978&forum=29&post_id=80156#forumpost80156

We ll I ve tried to setup Power2People bounty on matter and got a simple answer that current OWB MorphOS is not suitable since its NOT completely open source. Surely, this longer exponations of it being closely tied to MorphOS explain it.

Well, currently one has to admit - MorphOS has better browsing experience. That with hungry and unstable TW make matters for OS4 users worse (not only in comparison to MOS)

Browsers, beside office, being critical points of OS usability and MOS and OS4 developers at some point could even have a need to halt OS development to resolve the matter. Without those, great OS itself is quite unsuitable for anything but fun. :juggler:
Future Acube and MOS supporter, fi di good, nothing fi di unprofessionals. Learn it harder way! http://www.youtube.com/user/rasvoja and https://www.facebook.com/rasvoja