Defining amiga-likeness of products is so complex issue and prone to flamewars I'm not oing to enter it at all.. There are different views on this and will be until the end of times.
For example.. Personally I consider this current 'owner' of Amiga name (actually their so called Ip-ownership is so debatable it would require own thread) a more or less waste of money (and energy) spend. So those products are and will be better without it. And sooner it'll happen the better. At the same time I see a lot people consider them to be key element of this Amiga-definition.
