Pecosbil wrote:
Those test (all AmigaOnes and Pegaos) were done with exactly the same executable. Yes, the Pegasos used on those test is a April-1 one...
Ok. Didn't see that mentioned on Saku foorum, it's good to know.
IIRC many of those old bytemarks are so smal tests they fit into L1 cache of C3 CPU... only couple of them were affected at all of absense of L2 cache as shown on those first numbers from Gunne.
One that would show performance diffies might be real life size tests. Like doing batch of 50 2megapixel 1600*1200 sized digital images and make some basic effects (smooth?) to them and store back to disk (in png?). Main idea is that even if software itself would it to CPU caches the data definitely would not. Jpeg would be about 500k but it expanded to 32-bit image for manipulation takes bit over 7 megabytes or Ram each.
That imagesize is nothing biggie these days (actually 5 megapixel is more top of line and batch conversions (scaling etc) are everyday items with anyone taking pictures and using them.
I think this kind of test could be made quite simply with standard Unix tools (PPM etc..) and some shellscripting?