The point is the difference between Law and what is fair. Lawyers did not get the stereotype they have for nothing. They make the laws to keep themselves in a job. (I have a daughter finishing law school and she would agree).
Same poin for the EULA. Is it legal to use OS10 on a non-Apple branded device. No Is it fair to pay for it and be able to use on one. No
"can you buy a 10 person license and use it for 15? Is that OK? Can you buy an upgrade license for XP, and use it to make a full install on an OEM machine?"
Noone would argue that this is unfair to the owner of the IP, as well as distributers ect.. But using a paid for , on one machine at time by the purchaser, software seems fair to all. Unfair laws need to be changed. Perhaps this is the form of protest chosen by some.
I have no desire ofr OS10 and am waiting for OS4 before purchasing an A1. If OS4 doesn't materialize so much for the A1. Feel sorry for the early adopters in that case.
Stew