KennyR wrote:
I think they've just run out of things to try. As Israel's rulers slide further and further to the extreme right, they keep escalating their methods to solve the terrorist problem. Or rather, to remove it. They're not interested in solving the issue, which is why they're building a wall to keep it out.
Escalating hasn't worked before, I doubt if it will work now. What if this man was limiting the terrorism for political reasons and his replacement is even more belligerent?
No, this will fail, and a lot of innocent Israelis and even more innocent Palestinians will die for it. It will fail because force isn't the answer - unless of course the violence escalates into plain genocide.
What is the answer other than striking out at the leaders of terror. A peaceful solution has been put forward before. Not perfect, but a place to start. Didn't work. Its all or nothing. That means death and distruction.
But . . . lets say, the Isreali's and Palastinian's decide tomorrow that there will be peace. The nations around them will not allow it. If it wasn't for the surrounding nations (Saddam only one them) there might actually be peace. The wall, although not the best idea, will at least limit the amount of attacks by homicide bombers. And maybe in the future make it easier to talk peace and then take them down.
"There must be security for all or none are secure." ((Day The earth Stood Still.))
Now, i'm not pro or con for either side. But, I have my own solution for the problem, but it would be socially unacceptable by most. Therefor I will keep it to myself.