Impersonation huh? it is impersonation if he said he was CEO, or said nothing. But he said he was not yet CEO of AMiga Inc and is thereby not impersonating a CEO. That is the "evidence" we have.
It's interesting, how the very same persons who took as FACT that Bill Buck forged the card, now, as it turns out to be genuine take it as FACT, that GH explained to each person he handed the cards out that it's not real.
The only FACT we have that GH produced cards which contain false information. Everything else is hearsay, and we are unable to check.
I know, it's a custom to bend the reality until we can blame everything Bill Buck for on one side, and another custom to bend it so much that everything can be blamed on the red side.
How come the closest supporters of Amiga Inc shouted and suggested loudest that the card is a forgery made up by Bill Buck? The very same, that tell us now the card was indeed genuine, but all is still Bill Bucks fault. *scratches head* Can someone explain how you got to that conclusion?
(RANT)I tend to read BBRV's statements with certain scepticism, and always strip the marketing twist and hype, but it's IMHO still better than living in a distortion field where despite any evidence, always the blue side is the obvious cause of each and single trouble on the way(/RANT)
