It's nothing personal this time, and in no way connected to the thread or actual posts, just...
It's a custom by now, that comments/guesses made upon publicly available information are questioned by some with insider information. Why is it then that most comments, information and hinted dates/infos by those with insider information turn out to be less precise than the estimated guesses based on the public info?
I just speak in general of the phaenomenon itself. Maybe being an "insider" is a bias in itself to some degree?
As to
You should add "that I know of, based on publically available information".
Otherwise your statement is just plainly wrong.
Do you expect everyone to add to each statement the same? Publicly not available information is that: not publicly available. In other words: no one knows about that, and I don't see the point taking into account each time the fact that there may be some unknown factor unless it is known...
