Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: The OpenAmiga Standard  (Read 30746 times)

Description:

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Warface

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 970
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.spacehawks.hu
Re: The OpenAmiga Standard
« on: June 11, 2003, 12:31:05 PM »
Nice initiative.

Realistic mode ON

This will die in envy and intentional wrongdoings.

Realistic mode OFF

Having such a system, kept clean and used by all participants with good will and intentions - ehh, uhh... Sorry, my imagination fails me :-)

I have some recollections that I saw some posts discussing the low level keyboard layout, where MOS developers decided to use AROS or Amithlon "standard"? (precedents)

Setting up standards is a fine idea. I'd even dare to entrust AROS developers with that.

Quote
This should be decided by the Community not the AmigaOS clone teams


Mention THE company too. ZICO specification... There are still no ZICO compilant devices... Hope this initiative will have better results, and will be better maintained.
 

Offline Warface

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 970
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.spacehawks.hu
Re: The OpenAmiga Standard
« Reply #1 on: June 11, 2003, 12:44:55 PM »
Quote
Exactly. Thats why Im suggesting to throw everything out apart from what is in AOS3.1 and anything new that comes in should not be one or the other of the contencious subsystems in popular use.


I agree with CGX/P96 and MUI/Reaction independency. And I admit, I have no idea how to set standards that fit and favour both.



However, we can avoid reinventing the wheel and having different standards if we standardise the lowest level standards. (Like standardizing the raw keycodes for certain keys which are not available on the classic amiga, having the same OS functions for extra mouse keys in each alternative, etc.)

We have some precedents what we can use/integrate into the new OSes. Some need changes, some are good as they are.

Amithlon and AROS has experience with standard, PC world hardwares, while MOS and AmigaOS4 is just a follower. Having different standards for MOS and AmigaOS4 than AROS/Amithlon in low level hardware handling may lead to irrepairable "standard" issues.

As both OSes are still in a maturing phase, it's easier to set the standards now, than later.

Agreement from all sides is needed though.

 

Offline Warface

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 970
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.spacehawks.hu
Re: The OpenAmiga Standard
« Reply #2 on: June 11, 2003, 01:46:50 PM »
Quote
So basically what you are saying is that you want AROS to be the reference implementation of a standard that is basically the AROS design documents?


Practically... Why not? AmigaONE/Pegasos is 80-90% is a PC like platform, apart from the CPU and the Articia chip. Where AROS has more experience.