Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Amiga 1200 versus Atari Falcon?  (Read 18276 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline qwerty40001

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 9
    • Show all replies
Re: Amiga 1200 versus Atari Falcon?
« on: December 27, 2010, 01:35:01 PM »
Atari Falcon compared to Amiga 1200 has also:

- processor with MMU

- chunky 16bit truecolor mode,

- Multitos - Unix based operating system with memory protection.

The graphics capabilities of the Atari Falcon, classic Amiga reached only with an additional graphics card.

Atari Falcon was a much better computer than the Amiga 1200, but also was a much better computer than the Amiga 4000.
 

Offline qwerty40001

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 9
    • Show all replies
Re: Amiga 1200 versus Atari Falcon?
« Reply #1 on: December 27, 2010, 07:27:17 PM »
Quote from: Iggy;602212
That's what I love about this forum, so many objective opinions. Personally, I'd love to have a Falcon to play around with. Its graphics modes don't require some of the intensely bizzarre and convoluted programing coding required by the Amiga.

The point is, that AGA was completely worthless crap.

Even in 1992 it was much less than they had PC / Mac / Atari.

Graphics card in the Amiga was strictly necessary to normal work.

Unfortunately, some morons gives an almost religious veneration for AGA.