Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Am I the only one who doesn't hate AGA?  (Read 22056 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline qwerty40001

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 9
    • Show all replies
Re: Am I the only one who doesn't hate AGA?
« on: December 26, 2010, 07:02:44 PM »
Aga works terribly slow.  Even the Atari, in 1992, had 16-bit  chunky pixel mode in Falcon.  The biggest problem with this shit, is that it is regarded as something that must be in the Amiga.  Makes me want to puke at the thought of writing complex algorithms, whose sole purpose is to be fast spreading bits after bitplans.  Plus ham mode where the pixels depend on the previous pixels as a whole also unnecessarily complicated. Especially when compared with PC / Mac / Atari of those years where, thanks to chunky pixel 16bit modes, everything was getting pretty fast and straight.
 

Offline qwerty40001

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 9
    • Show all replies
Re: Am I the only one who doesn't hate AGA?
« Reply #1 on: December 31, 2010, 09:31:30 AM »
Quote from: Khephren;602966
My answer is the same as then, AGA was cool but slow.  


AGA would be cool if AGA would be appeared in 1990.


In 1992, AGA was crap.