AINC VS HYPERION - Hyperion Lost?

[Atheist]

number6 wrote:
@stefcep2

At least the Itec case against Hyperion has been disposed of.
What that means is somewhat debatable.

#113 and whatever follows

#6

Hi #6,

If ITEC has to pay Hyperion Entertainment's legal fees, Hyperion W O N !!!!!!!!!!

WooooooooHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!


I'll save the laughter until all the results are visible.



Hi mailman,

I believe lodging means, that some of the people from Europe may testify in person, so the trial date would have to be when they can attend, within reason. Hence "lodging" in Seattle for the trial dates.

[Atheist]

Actually, there are 2 reasons why a court appointed settlement can't work.

Amiga Inc. Wa. no longer has the contract, and the company that DOES, their name isn't on the contract. Only the original Amiga Inc. Wa. can be the owner. (Amiga Inc. Wa. will cease to be on Sep. 28, 2008? Or should I say Amino LLC? BTW, what great products does Amino LLC Wa. make??!?!?! Website? WHO works there?)

2nd thing is, Hyperion Entertainment in NO way, shape or form has an obligation to have to pay their lawyer's fees due to KMOS's (MKOS?) action against them. They're the equivalent of an unconcerned party bringing a lawsuit into court.

Will Amiga Inc. Del. (if they're allowed to hold that name) pay H.E.'s court costs? I think not!

[Atheist]

lou_dias wrote:

When you initiate a law suit and lose, the defending party can recover their court costs from you in the USA.  This was implimented to stop frivilous lawsuits that were so common at one time...

Hi lou_dias,

Hmmmmm, well, in a court appointed settlement, is there a "winner" and "loser" for money to be paid out for lawyer's fees of one side over another? I guess there never really was a trial as some kind of settlement occurs with both walking away, both feeling like they've lost. So both pay their own fees?


Frankly in my opinion, Amiga Inc. Del. is a fraud, as they have NOTHING holding them back from releasing AOS5 onto a starving hungry world! Well, other than it doesn't exist?

I haven't read even one sentence anywhere of HE opposed to AOS5.0 being sold, anyhow. HE never opposed AmigaAnywhere2 being distributed.

[Atheist]

jorkany wrote:
Manu,

1. There is going to be a judical settlement between Amiga Inc. and Hyperion on which Eyetech and Itec will appear.

Since Itech and Eyetech are phonetically the same, I wonder if they'll have to refer to one in the courtroom banter as "with an 'I'" or something?

Would that have anything to do with "An 'I' for an 'Eye'"? :-P ;-) :-)

[Atheist]

lou_dias wrote:

weirdami wrote:
@lou_dias

I said early on that if the ITEC contract is "in accordance with the 2001 contract" then those rules apply.  Then I got a beatdown saying that it's simply "no, it's I pay $25,000 and you give me OS4."  Seems the judge agreed with the former angle.

Hi lou_dias,

I read almost all of the threads and posts of the court cases over there.

And, I must say that they gave quite the wide latitude to the ones who were putting anti-Hyperion statements forward, and more than a few warnings to pro-Hyperion posters.

I left there quite a while ago over that issue.


BTW; "HE", I was meaning "Hyperion Entertainment" for short.

[Atheist]

I haven't read even one sentence anywhere of HE opposed to AOS5.0 being sold, anyhow. HE never opposed AmigaAnywhere2 being distributed.

I haven't read even one sentence anywhere of Hyperion Entertainment opposed to AOS5.0 being sold, anyhow. Hyperion Entertainment never opposed AmigaAnywhere2 being distributed.

Is the paragraph in full.
======

These two products are no threat to AOS4.x. One doesn't even exist!! Hahahahahahahaha!

OTOH, when they win the USPTO dispute, they may have something different to say about it. :-D

[Atheist]

So, Amiga Inc. Del.'s King Kong law firm made a mistake in pursuing the case in Del.? Some "experts"!

We'll know in 4 weeks whether Itec has cash or not. If they don't pay Hyperion Entertainment's lawyer by the end of Sept., then when the negotiations in Oct/Nov happen, Mr. Kinsel can call them the deadbeats that they are.

Or can he?

Can it be brought up in negotiations that the other party is untrustworthy to anything they may agree to, if Itec doesn't pay Hyperion's lawyer bill in total before the negotiation starts? (Since they can't bring up the hogwash Kent Arena scam?)