AmigaONE benchmark - Important

[Atheist]

I have a 2.26 GHz P4 w 533 MHz FSB, 1 Gig ram DDR2100.
w98se

I started the program to do RC5. The OGR24, started instead (I think 24, not 25, whichever is default.) I got, with McAfee firewall and anti-virus in the background, and as near as I can tell all other unnecessary prgs off, 9.1 to 9.3 million nodes a second. So, WOW, A1!!!

RC5, stats
****************************
.....10%.....20%.....30%.....40%.....50%.....60%.....70%.....80%.....90%....100
[Feb 19 06:56:05 UTC] RC5-72: Completed CA:447DFD29:00000000 (1.00 stats units)
                      0.00:22:54.15 - [3,125,592 keys/s]
[Feb 19 06:56:05 UTC] RC5-72: Loaded CA:447DFDD6:00000000:1*2^32
[Feb 19 06:56:05 UTC] RC5-72: Summary: 29 packets (29.00 stats units)
                      0.10:49:43.92 - [3,192,544 keys/s]
[Feb 19 06:56:05 UTC] RC5-72: 16 packets (16.00 stats units) remain in
                      buff-in.r72
                      Projected ideal time to completion: 0.05:57:20.00
[Feb 19 06:56:05 UTC] RC5-72: 8 packets (8.00 stats units) are in
                      buff-out.r72
.....10%.....20%.....30%.....40%.....50%.....60%.....70%.....80%.....90%....100
[Feb 19 07:18:54 UTC] RC5-72: Completed CA:447DFDD6:00000000 (1.00 stats units)
                      0.00:22:49.01 - [3,137,318 keys/s]
[Feb 19 07:18:54 UTC] RC5-72: Loaded CA:447DFDD8:00000000:1*2^32
[Feb 19 07:18:54 UTC] RC5-72: Summary: 30 packets (30.00 stats units)
                      0.11:12:32.93 - [3,190,670 keys/s]
[Feb 19 07:18:54 UTC] RC5-72: 15 packets (15.00 stats units) remain in
                      buff-in.r72
                      Projected ideal time to completion: 0.05:35:00.00
[Feb 19 07:18:54 UTC] RC5-72: 9 packets (9.00 stats units) are in
                      buff-out.r72
.....10%.....20%.....30%.....40%.....50%...
[Feb 19 07:31:38 UTC] Paused... (user generated)
**********************

I think the highest I got was 3,240,000 keys/sec

Amiga! Why? Because I'm a power-user!

[Atheist]

Karlos wrote:
All this fretting over what the x86 can do faster and vice versa is just silly.

Lets get smart, have fun and bash out some nice shiny new apps for these machines, rather than running synthetic benchmarks and whingeing ;-)

Maybe it's just me, but this makes a lot of sense!

Anyhow, the new AOS4.0 kernal is going to be bigger, because it has more capability AND more instructions, due to being RISC, instead of CISC, So, we really have NO idea of real world performance. Even that benchmark doesn't necessarily reveal anything, because it was using Linux after all. BUT, RC5-72, at a binary level, is probably almost the same in Linux or AOS4.0. Only, the external actions of the OS's determine how many cycles are taken away from the OGR's or RC5s calculated. So we wait.....

Amiga! "Last one out, turn off the monitor," says Amy, the mascot.

[Atheist]

The glory of AmigaOne will only be realised when moto get off of their buts and make the 1.4 GHz available.

Or rather, to heck with them, the 970 from IBM @1.8 GHz!!!

Unless the producers of our neurons give us something we can run with, we'll glow rather than shine!!

Amiga! Has 2 legs in a tree legged race. :-(