No...no, that's not at all what I'm talking about. I'm talking about history. What IF Commodore, back in the 1980s, didn't wind up with the Amiga.
Title does use the word "doesn't", which indicates something current. "Didn't" would be more appropriate to talk about something that did or might not have happened a few decades ago. As would some mention that you're not tallking about Today Commodore or their current claimed desire to have Amiga and current use of Amiga name, and the assumption that there is a fight about that. I don't consider myself obsessed with today Commodore USA, I don't even think of them other than when I see posts about Commodore. But I did assume that's what this was about. The mention of Atari, etc. confused me until I saw the later clarification post.
