Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Infringement of AmigaOS trademark  (Read 17457 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline slaapliedje

  • Lifetime Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 843
  • Country: 00
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • Show all replies
Re: Infringement of AmigaOS trademark
« on: February 24, 2014, 09:40:19 AM »
Quote from: Minuous;759244
So are Lindows and Windows; there is no need for them to be identical.

This isn't how the Lindows vs Windows went down anyhow.  Microsoft lost that case, and then basically paid them to change the name to Linspire.

"In 2002 Microsoft sued Lindows, Inc. claiming the name Lindows constituted an infringement of their Windows trademark. Microsoft's claims were rejected by the court, which asserted that Microsoft had used the term windows  to describe graphical user interfaces before the Windows product was  ever released, and that the windowing technique had already been  implemented by Xerox and Apple Computer many years before.[7] Microsoft sought a retrial and after this was postponed in February 2004,[8]  offered to settle the case. As part of the licensing settlement,  Microsoft paid an estimated $20 million, and Lindows, Inc. transferred  the Lindows trademark to Microsoft and changed its name to Linspire, Inc.[9]" - From Wikipedia.

slaapliedje
« Last Edit: February 24, 2014, 09:42:56 AM by slaapliedje »
A4000D: Mediator 4000Di; Voodoo 3, ZorRAM 128MB, 10/100mb Ethernet, Spider 2. Cyberstorm PPC 060/50 604e/420.
 

Offline slaapliedje

  • Lifetime Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 843
  • Country: 00
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • Show all replies
Re: Infringement of AmigaOS trademark
« Reply #1 on: February 24, 2014, 04:42:04 PM »
The worse part is, the ones who 'own' the Amiga trademark are the ones that have the least amount of hardware their Operating System can run on.

AROS obviously runs on the most,
MorphOS the second most,
68k Classics arguably have more hardware available than OS4 does!

It's too bad that all camps just can't get along and try to bring the Amiga back a bit more to the mainstream, but I don't think that could ever happen now, the best chance it had was probably when Gateway had it, but I don't even know if Gateway computers are even around anymore...

slaapliedje
A4000D: Mediator 4000Di; Voodoo 3, ZorRAM 128MB, 10/100mb Ethernet, Spider 2. Cyberstorm PPC 060/50 604e/420.
 

Offline slaapliedje

  • Lifetime Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 843
  • Country: 00
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • Show all replies
Re: Infringement of AmigaOS trademark
« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2014, 07:05:57 AM »
Quote from: yssing;759812
@Minuous I think he is just pissed that he couldn't call his linux distro for amiga.

LAmiga?  :D

slaapliedje
A4000D: Mediator 4000Di; Voodoo 3, ZorRAM 128MB, 10/100mb Ethernet, Spider 2. Cyberstorm PPC 060/50 604e/420.
 

Offline slaapliedje

  • Lifetime Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 843
  • Country: 00
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • Show all replies
Re: Infringement of AmigaOS trademark
« Reply #3 on: February 28, 2014, 04:05:42 AM »
Would have been nice if we could get some investor to snag the Amiga trademark and give it to the community so anyone could use it.

But then that's just not the way it worked out.  The Atari community is a lot better off in that regard, where I think most of the software bits on top of TOS was basically open sourced, and for the TOS bits, they've been reverse engineered easily with Emu-TOS.  Would have been interesting if that'd happened to the AmigaOS, or even a lot of the parts of it.  I know some libraries have been recreated, and there is AROS.  Anyhow, just kind of a mini-rant.

slaapliedje
A4000D: Mediator 4000Di; Voodoo 3, ZorRAM 128MB, 10/100mb Ethernet, Spider 2. Cyberstorm PPC 060/50 604e/420.
 

Offline slaapliedje

  • Lifetime Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 843
  • Country: 00
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • Show all replies
Re: Infringement of AmigaOS trademark
« Reply #4 on: March 03, 2014, 06:51:57 PM »
Quote from: persia;760016
BigBenAussie?  He's sort of disappeared since CUSA folded.  He was close to Barry and likely the only one who shared his vision.  But he'd need financial backers.

The X64 was inspired but very niche, ultimately Barry failed to establish a non-niche product.

Yeah, they really were too expensive, and the 'Amiga-like' cases were just rebadged cases from one of the HTPC style manufacturers if I recall.  

While I didn't necessarily agree with CommodoreUSA's plans, it was kind of sad to see them go, it was just another reminder of Commodore's demise.  Similar to the talks of Atari going bankrupt a few years ago.  Even though it's no longer the Atari or Commodore we love(d), it's a reminder of what was once great, that faded away.

It still boggles my mind how Apple, that no one I even knew had any of their stuff back in the day, had survived, but yet everyone I know had either Atari or Commodore computers, and they both died out.

As I always say, it seems the worse technology always wins out because it's 'cheap'.

slaapliedje
A4000D: Mediator 4000Di; Voodoo 3, ZorRAM 128MB, 10/100mb Ethernet, Spider 2. Cyberstorm PPC 060/50 604e/420.