Amiga osX

[Philespin]

Bulsh..., if you bought genuine software.  That's simple, you are'nt a pirate EVEN if apple doesn't agree with that.  Maybe we don't see EULA in the same manner.  I'm not agreeing with apple or any  othesr companies on these type of licenses.  Paid something and BE forced to buy the same branded product, thats for me is simple: a forced selling (or a deny of free choice).  

Maybe if you bought a new car and by your contract must use a particular branded fuel cause it's writed (same as EULA) ...  Er you wouldn't agree if same fuel exist on the same manner but cheap.  Is that how i see clause in  EULA sometimes.  Piracy is when you don't bought software or you stole code for doing what you want with it.


Er and i'm not so good with english as you can read.

Philespin

by the way don't tell me if you aren't agree don't buy... It's by the fault of consummer who never read EULA that's these thing can exist.  i will not extend on that

[Philespin]

Sometimes you are'nt funny.  You did some bad shortcut in your text.  Maybe you just studborn.  You won't read what other says:  Fair use, just fair use and not abusive contract (refer to some clause of EULA).  In my land, you can't force someone to buy things with another.  If you sell an OSX retail, that's it, you can use it where you want as long as you use it only on One computer at once.  

Simple no.  Eula isn't the truht every time.  I don't sign a contract with my name, i don't know that before open the box ... where the law stand here, i'm wondering...

Maybe we can say Marktime the studborn, but that kind of comportement isn't funny.  So please stay in debate.

Philespin