Okay. Am I to read 'has the rights to' as 'is owner of'? Or as 'cannot be legally locked out of prior licensing agreements'? Both cases would force all parties back to the negiotiating table, so that's good news.
However, what is to stop Amiga, Inc. from swiftly splitting up the proposed OS development path into a DE-only and AOS4-only one? Or renaming future upgrades to the AOS4 4.0.x as to avoid selling a 4.2 product? (I'm sure that they cannot easily do so because of agreements with Hyperion, but still.) I can't recall DE as being that big a hit, so they might decide to drop DE-support in its entirety, turning the court ruling into a Phyrric victory if nothing else.
In other words, I'm still confused, but I take it that's a normal reaction... :-)
