Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Michael Jackson is NOT GUILTY  (Read 18779 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Cymric

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 1031
    • Show all replies
Re: Michael Jackson is NOT GUILTY
« on: June 15, 2005, 02:44:12 PM »
Quote
Wayne wrote:
Michael Jackson, not guilty by reason of celebrity. Nothing else needs be said.

Not quite true: the actual evidence was paper thin and suggested rather than proved. The members of the jury were quite aware of the difference; no mean feat in a country which in a remote location on Cuba seeks to do exactly the opposite! I am quite sure that Jackson did things which were revolting as well as highly illegal, but unfortunately for all the children who didn't press charges, the witnesses who did were not exactly stellar. That is vastly unfair and morally inexcusable, but laws and trials were never about fairness or justice. They are about, well, laws.

In any case, the participants in this muppet show have emerged badly scarred. Jackson will never be able to hold another party for children at his home, unless he is separated from them with barbed wire and kept under continuous camera surveillance. His image, already tarnished, has sunk pretty much to rock bottom after this mediashark feeding frenzy. And perhaps it makes parents in general wonder just a little bit more about taking sensible precautions before handing over your child to someone you don't really know. Even if it is a celebrity.
Some people say that cats are sneaky, evil and cruel. True, and they have many other fine qualities as well.
 

Offline Cymric

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 1031
    • Show all replies
Re: Michael Jackson is NOT GUILTY
« Reply #1 on: June 15, 2005, 03:41:41 PM »
You penned down a non-sequitur. Prosecution was bleepy, but that does not mean an unfavourable ruling is caused the salary of the defense lawyers. There are more causes. If you put lousy witnesses on the stand---and that was something the Dutch papers strongly suggested---you can expect them to be gunned down by any lawyer, no matter how many zeroes there are on his pay cheque. A trial is not a game where you ask the other party to go easy on your witnesses just because you are not so good a lawyer, or the witness simply stinks!

In addition, your argument is very subjective: there are plenty of examples where the salary of the lawyer did not do a thing because the evidence was so overwhelming. I am quite sure you wouldn't have mentioned it were Jackson found to be guilty. But you will remember the sentiment that the jury verdict was solely caused by big money and big star status.

I really feel very sorry for the children who did not see justice served, but as I said before, laws and trials are not about justice. This concludes my contributions to this discussion. I have made my point clear and see little reason to continue elaborating it.
Some people say that cats are sneaky, evil and cruel. True, and they have many other fine qualities as well.