Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: X1000 benchmarks  (Read 18740 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Kesa

  • Ninja Fruit Slasher
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 2408
    • Show all replies
Re: X1000 benchmarks
« on: February 03, 2012, 10:14:25 PM »
Quote from: Karlos;679021
:roflmao:  Wine? On linux PPC? QEmu, perhaps. Wine Is Not an Emulator.

I knew it was only a matter of time before someone mentioned DosBox or "virtualisation". You people make me sick!  :p

In all seriousness you don't really think people would spend all that money just to emulate Windoes do you? What a waste. Please, get that Windoes **** off here :rant:
Even my cat doesn\'t like me.
 

Offline Kesa

  • Ninja Fruit Slasher
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 2408
    • Show all replies
Re: X1000 benchmarks
« Reply #1 on: February 03, 2012, 11:55:56 PM »
@Karlos. I agree with everything you just said :)

My stance on running DosBox is an ethical one and think it has no meaningful place on Amiga's. But it may be useful here in making meaningful benchmarks possible. I think it is funny how people are putting the x1000 down because it has only just been released and not even optimized yet. It is still in beta as the software that has been made for it has yet to be released. With this in mind it could be a while before it reaches it's full potential.  

There's is nothing wrong with being a OS4.x fanboy. Although i have never used OS4.x i can see the appeal as it seems to recreate the classic 3.x workbenches whereas Morphos, as much as i like it, still feels like an Apple somehow and I'm not talking about the hardware. I have a love hate relationship with both the blue and red camps   :)

It sounds to me you are thinking of getting an x1000?
Even my cat doesn\'t like me.