First day CUSA admits some mistakes and call them not trivial.
Now using Barry tactics, I might be wrong for not knowing what you have seen, but it doesn`t matter anyway
because I have a licence to vox name.
Huh?
Barry said in interview its all up to licencee. Even the software part "because Microsoft also does the same". Its good there is a Leo from Australia pretending to be support, since he is litterate and Barry to chat on the phone.
But again, there is more serious ways to setup the business.
And software support is updates and drivers. Without Linux mint team and with millions of possible driver combinations ...
Correct, for those who buy a barebones system and install whatever CPU/Mobo/GPU/PSU they want, they are deal with the headaches. It would not be reasonable if someone installs whatever hardware for C=USA to have to support it, as it needs to be the retailer since they are the ones who bought the hardware and have access to warranties. As an example, let us say someone bought a new Commodore Amiga 1000X barebones model and sold it with a SAM460 installed in it. No way C=USA is going to be able to give support, it would be the retailer who assembled it would be the one providing support. You have a issue with this or is it just a convenient excuse to troll against C=USA?