Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: What is the WORST tune you have ever listened to???  (Read 7152 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Karlos

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16879
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 5 times
    • Show all replies
Re: What is the WORST tune you have ever listened to???
« on: July 17, 2004, 09:06:16 PM »
I don't really know. These days you are spoiled for choice when asked "which is the biggest bag of arse you had the misfortune of hearing in the last 24 hours?"
int p; // A
 

Offline Karlos

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16879
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 5 times
    • Show all replies
Re: What is the WORST tune you have ever listened to???
« Reply #1 on: July 20, 2004, 11:51:26 AM »
Quote

that_punk_guy wrote:
'Everybody's Changing' by Keane.

Whoever the hell that is. I just know it gets played three times a day at work on the local radio station. It's the most infuriating song ever and I'm pretty sure the piano sample is out of key.


Whist I agree it's a bloody awful song to have to listen to, at least it actually can be called music. There's some chordal variation, structure etc. That's already way more than can be said for much of the crap today.

However, that piano (or whatever the hell it is) really does manage to have the same effect as someone scratching a chalkboard, doesn't it? :-D

I suspect most of the instruments in there are detuned slightly. Done properly, detuning can give a very nice results, eg. seperating a thick chorus of instruments playing in the same range. Alas whatever they did sounds frickin' terrible!
int p; // A
 

Offline Karlos

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16879
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 5 times
    • Show all replies
Re: What is the WORST tune you have ever listened to???
« Reply #2 on: July 21, 2004, 12:19:11 AM »
Quote

Speelgoedmannetje wrote:
Quote

Karlos wrote:
Whist I agree it's a bloody awful song to have to listen to, at least it actually can be called music. There's some chordal variation, structure etc. That's already way more than can be said for much of the crap today.
this I call a lousy argument. You expect a certain structure, and I think this is a very narrow view towards music (or other arts)


You have your own definition of music and I have mine.

It's not a lousy argument just because you don't happen to agree. I don't *expect* any particular structure and I listen to a very wide variety of music. However, I do expect some structure and there is no need to adopt the presumptious role of "your'e narrow minded because you think something must be a particular way to be defined as such." Now that is a lousy argument :-D

As a hobbyist musician myself, I regard music as being more than a repetetive sound played over and over with no variation, progression.

Quote
The ideas/concepts behind popular music has been chewed on dozens of times before and are way too simple.


:lol: That's actually in direct contradiction of your first statement. How can it be too simple? Is that not expecting something in particular (eg a bit of complexity) of it in order for it to be acceptable?

BTW, don't take any of this personally, I'm just really fed up with most recent musical offerings ;-)
int p; // A