Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: a1200 vs. a4000  (Read 6332 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Karlos

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16879
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 5 times
    • Show all replies
Re: a1200 vs. a4000
« on: October 17, 2011, 12:33:41 AM »
Quote from: ChaosLord;663758
@Rednova

Do not get the A4000.  Its a waste of time.

I had an A4000 and an A1200 and I gave away my A4000 and kept my A1200.

Just do what I did:
1. Put A1200 in a Tower with a Mediator.
2. Expand away to your heart's content.
3.  Hey now that your A1200 is in a tower u suddenly have room for an A4000!  Or a u can slave a lowly core i5 bgcpc to ur mighty A1200 over ethernet as I have done.

A1200T + Mediator + Ethernet + Gfx card + Accellerator + Extra Ram + IDEfix + Giant Hard Drive FTW!

Cost aside, you did that totally the wrong way around IMNSHO. An A4000 + Mediator (+PCI Gfx Card, PCI NIC, PCI sound card etc) + CSPPC or any decent 060 board *destroys* any existing A1200 combination. Faster buses, proper DMA and a proper 32-bit address range for expansion space.

The only thing the A1200 can trump it on is the amount of RAM you can fit to an accelerator board: 256MB versus 128MB on the CSPPC.
int p; // A