Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Ripa bags it's first victim  (Read 7672 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Karlos

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16878
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 5 times
    • Show all replies
Re: Ripa bags it's first victim
« on: October 06, 2010, 09:30:33 PM »
Quote from: the_leander;583309
It has no provision for forgetting a password for starters. It also goes against the principle of not being forced to incriminate oneself.

Yeah, now you can instead incriminate yourself by wishing to keep what little privacy you do have left. You could be innocent of any crime except that of allowing complete strangers access to your personal belongings (I don't see why personal data shouldn't count).
« Last Edit: October 06, 2010, 09:33:10 PM by Karlos »
int p; // A
 

Offline Karlos

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16878
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 5 times
    • Show all replies
Re: Ripa bags it's first victim
« Reply #1 on: October 06, 2010, 09:42:31 PM »
Quote from: the_leander;583318
Suddenly, I can hear David Blunkett saying "if you've got nothing to hide you've nothing to fear"...


See no evil...


(ok, I admit, that was a pretty low blow)
int p; // A
 

Offline Karlos

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16878
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 5 times
    • Show all replies
Re: Ripa bags it's first victim
« Reply #2 on: October 06, 2010, 09:51:45 PM »
I did think twice about posting it, but meh.I doubt he'll read it any time soon anyway...
int p; // A
 

Offline Karlos

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16878
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 5 times
    • Show all replies
Re: Ripa bags it's first victim
« Reply #3 on: October 06, 2010, 10:07:54 PM »
Quote from: the_leander;583327
Suddenly, wild groaners appear!


Serious poster, I choose you!

Serious poster uses "return to topic".

It's not very effective.
int p; // A
 

Offline Karlos

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16878
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 5 times
    • Show all replies
Re: Ripa bags it's first victim
« Reply #4 on: October 07, 2010, 12:25:27 AM »
Quote from: Heiroglyph;583353
If you refuse a normal search warrant (a court ordered document), you are in contempt of court, which does carry a fine and potentially a jail sentence at the judges discretion.

That's why I don't see a difference on this particular point.


Technically perhaps, but in reality, the police are far more likely to gain forceful entrance to the property and since they gained entrance, you are extremely unlikely to be prosecuted for denying it.

They can't take a battering ram to your hard disk. Well, they could, but it wouldn't be an effective way of recovering the data...
int p; // A