Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: New ZorRAM Image  (Read 11443 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Karlos

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16879
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 5 times
    • Show all replies
Re: New ZorRAM Image
« on: May 21, 2010, 11:57:39 PM »
Quote from: amigakit;560034
@ Piru
Which speed test program would you like me to try?


I think memspeed is actually the name of the benchmarking application: http://aminet.net/package/util/cli/memspeed
int p; // A
 

Offline Karlos

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16879
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 5 times
    • Show all replies
Re: New ZorRAM Image
« Reply #1 on: May 22, 2010, 12:02:52 AM »
Quote from: amigakit;560025
Some initial tests of the initial ZorRAM we have received from production.


You just made my 256MB A1200 cry. Happy now?

:roflmao:
int p; // A
 

Offline Karlos

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16879
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 5 times
    • Show all replies
Re: New ZorRAM Image
« Reply #2 on: May 22, 2010, 11:36:49 AM »
Quote from: Piru;560180
http://aminet.net/package/util/moni/bustest


Oh yeah, forgot about that one :)
int p; // A
 

Offline Karlos

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16879
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 5 times
    • Show all replies
Re: New ZorRAM Image
« Reply #3 on: May 22, 2010, 11:40:47 AM »
Quote from: Tumbleweed;560185
But think of the possibilities! What could we do with 1gig of ram?

Weed

Not just 1GB of RAM, but 1GB of contiguous RAM (looking at the showconfig shot). If I recall correctly, X-Ray experimented with using Zorro 3 RAM expansions (screenshot in the gallery somewhere), but his memory seemed to be split into separate ranges.

-edit-

See here...
« Last Edit: May 22, 2010, 11:43:25 AM by Karlos »
int p; // A
 

Offline Karlos

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16879
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 5 times
    • Show all replies
Re: New ZorRAM Image
« Reply #4 on: May 22, 2010, 12:55:41 PM »
Quote from: Piru;560201
Got any ideas?


Well, I could use MIDI In to mix entire tracks (converted to AIFF) :lol:

Just imagine the time it would take to load them all !
int p; // A
 

Offline Karlos

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16879
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 5 times
    • Show all replies
Re: New ZorRAM Image
« Reply #5 on: May 22, 2010, 01:31:57 PM »
Quote from: amigakit;560208
I estimate that access times of Zorro memory would be around the approximate 10Mb/sec rates- but I have not yet run the memspeed test yet.  When I am back in the office on Monday/Tuesday I will run speedtests and post back the exact results.


I'd certainly expect the Zorro bus to be the limiting factor, rather than the memory itself.
int p; // A
 

Offline Karlos

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16879
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 5 times
    • Show all replies
Re: New ZorRAM Image
« Reply #6 on: May 22, 2010, 02:38:19 PM »
Quote from: Piru;560217
Hmm so it takes roughly 2 minutes to fill the 1GB memory. That's not very fast ;-)


The theoretical Z3 bus transfer rate limit is, what ~150MB/s ? Of course, the buster puts the brakes on long before that is reached.
int p; // A
 

Offline Karlos

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16879
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 5 times
    • Show all replies
Re: New ZorRAM Image
« Reply #7 on: May 22, 2010, 03:21:24 PM »
Quote from: kolla;560224
10Mb or 10MB?
Anyways, the CSPPC has UW SCSI with theoretical speed of 40MB/sec, so in principle it can be faster.


Megabytes/second. Z3 is not a serial bus, so quoting figures in Megabits/second would be unusual.
int p; // A