Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Anyone going to stand in line for this thing? Just wondering  (Read 27933 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Karlos

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16879
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 5 times
    • Show all replies
I'm sure it will sell plenty.

For myself, I'd rather have a Tegra 2 based device running linux.
int p; // A
 

Offline Karlos

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16879
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 5 times
    • Show all replies
Re: Anyone going to stand in line for this thing? Just wondering
« Reply #1 on: April 03, 2010, 01:11:01 PM »
@Lando

So, that's a no, then is it?
int p; // A
 

Offline Karlos

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16879
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 5 times
    • Show all replies
Re: Anyone going to stand in line for this thing? Just wondering
« Reply #2 on: April 03, 2010, 03:21:21 PM »
Quote
managed to basically get everything right with their spreadsheet package for example

Well, aside from being able to correctly present certain floating point numbers, you mean :-D

Quote
Yesterday evening we were alerted to an issue in Excel 2007 (and Excel Services 2007) involving calculation of numbers around 65,535.  The first example that we heard about was =77.1*850, but it became clear from our testing as well as additional reports that this was just one instance where Excel 2007 would return a value of 100,000 instead of 65,535.  The majority of these additional reports were focused on multiplication (ex. =5.1*12850; =10.2*6425; =20.4*3212.5 ), but our testing showed that this really didn't have anything do to with multiplication - it manifested itself with many but not all calculations in Excel that should have resulted in 65,535 (=65535*1 and =16383.75*4 worked for instance).  Further testing showed a similar phenomenon with 65,536 as well.  This issue only exists in Excel 2007, not previous versions.

I'm sure nobody would have noticed that :lol:
int p; // A