Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: WB 3.x uglier than WB1.x?  (Read 2726 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Karlos

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16879
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 5 times
    • Show all replies
Re: WB 3.x uglier than WB1.x?
« on: September 12, 2009, 01:49:56 PM »
I like the WB2.x topaz 8 font when viewed in the hires non-lace modes. I wish there were an equivalent that preserved the appearence on square pixel displays
int p; // A