I thought this was a community site, a friendly place...

[Karlos]

@bjjones

Your posts, at least those I have seen, are considered, well argued, non inflammatory. This alone sets you aside from the "most dispised creature in the universe", whom may share your views on some or all points but are also totally polarised against any view that differs from their single view of the universe, can never challenge them with real argument and swallow everything fox news throws at them as gospel ;-)

[Karlos]

@cecilia

Sexist? How's that :-?

[Karlos]

@iama

That's slightly hypocritical sentiment coming from "Mr I hate Fags!", isn't it?

[Karlos]

iamaboringperson wrote:
But I DO 'hate fags'! I just don't hate most supporters of major political parties, and most religions. And I certainly don't hang {bleep} on them here. I see no need to! Not an inelligent guy like me.

Selective memory, eh? Read Wains' post to see a shining example of youself ranting about how much you hate homosexuals.

-edit-

Oh wait, I forgot - you surely can't waste your valuable heterosexual time to read a post made by a "fag"*

Silly me :roll:

*By the way, since when have cigarettes been able to express opinions?

-/edit-

So, it's OK to rant on about how much you hate "fags" - who have done absolutely sod all to you or anybody else, whereas someone ranting about how much they hate GWB, who has sanctioned the murder of thousands of people is out of order?

[Karlos]

This has just about become a flaming contest between you and I

Hardly, I have no desire to emulate your behaviour for any longer than was necessary to point it out to yourself.

I was simply exposing the discontinuity in your argument - you were criticizing others for being vocal about their objection to something, when you yourself can be, have been, and often are just as vocal.

If you have an issue with X, there are ways to present your argument without resorting to insults and ranting.

For example, if I express my disgust with the attitude of Bush and his cronies, it is not without explanation.

And to be quite frank, Karlos, I don't want that.

Me neither.

Having established your position, can you reason to us why you hate homosexuals?

[Karlos]

Cyberus wrote:
Sorry, its gone wildly OT hasn't it?
First an exchange between Karlos and iama, and then CU_AMiGA launches a personal attack on me! (that's a joke, CU)

I'd just like to apologise for the (hopefully) uncharacteristic behaviour there. I'm not normally incensed to get into that kind of personal confrontation with another user.

Bad day at the office ;-)

[Karlos]

odin wrote:
Dead-thread-shag-alert!  :-P

You kinky bugger :lol: