spirantho wrote:
If CBM and Atari had won.... in other words, without the ultra-fierce competition between technology developers, because they're both closed companies....
Our computers would have about 200MHz processors, about as powerful as a Celeron 300, using about 128MB RAM and about 4 Gig hard disks. Permedia-2 equivalent power for graphics cards.
The internet would be at about HTML 3 standard, no dynamic HTML, no streaming video in good quality. Broadband would be about 512KBps.
However, the operating systems would still run faster than they do today.... and computing might still be fun.
I doubt that that since Atari and CMB would still be competing with game consoles, Sega released a computer based on their console back in 1983 during the boom of Z-80 based home computers and there would be no reason why Sega wouldn't have done it again if the specs of home computers were close to the specs of its home consoles.
I think we'd have seen Atari, Amiga and Mac share the some basic architecture, they might differ with graphic and audio chipset but odds are they would have been pushed onto cards to make them far more upgradeable with low end models having these chips integrated.