Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: The ultimate Amiga One (what it should be)  (Read 9325 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mikeymike

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 3420
  • Country: 00
    • Show all replies
Re: The ultimate Amiga One (what it should be)
« on: June 01, 2004, 11:41:11 AM »
Also, 64-bit CPUs do not run twice as fast as 32-bit CPUs.

Infact, the move to 64-bit CPUs isn't a particularly required or useful upgrade right now, especially for the average customer.  In a 64-bit length of code, some of it is the instruction, and the rest is the data to be processed by that instruction.  In some applications, having a long data stream is useful, like say database processing, but for many other applications, small instructions regarding small amounts of data is the norm.  Even a well-implemented 64-bit port of an application may not yield signifcantly better performance, because at the end of the day, the amount of 'work' hasn't increased (ie. a bigger calculation isn't necessarily a better thing).

There is also little or no support for 64-bit CPUs, and Hyperion does not have the time or money to take on a project where not only a move from 32 to 64 bit code is required, but a complete change of architecture is also required.

It would be nice if AmigaOnes were better value for money, but personally I would rather see them be more expensive and survive (in a business sense) for longer.  I think time has yet to tell for the A1 or Pegasos.
 

Offline mikeymike

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 3420
  • Country: 00
    • Show all replies
Re: The ultimate Amiga One (what it should be)
« Reply #1 on: June 02, 2004, 10:54:32 AM »
Quote
Common guys! remember when the amiga 1000 came out? it was revolutionary not just for its os but its architecture!

The industry was ripe for such a venture at that time.  It is not now, not without billions of dollars available.

All the leading players however are doing what Hi-Torro did, designing custom chips (for example, ATi, NVidia, Sony).  Those that don't fall behind very quickly (Nintendo for example).

PPC's only hope is IBM, and will need Apple to help get PPC CPUs into computers in a wide enough scale.

Eyetech is a seller of hardware, not a maker.  Hyperion is a small software company which doesn't happen to be made of money.  Genesi is in a similar situation.

The only thing I feel that Hyperion/Eyetech should be doing but apparently aren't is to try and drum up support/attention for software development for OS4, though OS4 is probably needed out in the field in order to make the effort look more substantial.
 

Offline mikeymike

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 3420
  • Country: 00
    • Show all replies
Re: The ultimate Amiga One (what it should be)
« Reply #2 on: June 02, 2004, 12:37:09 PM »
- edited by mikeymike :-) -
 

Offline mikeymike

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 3420
  • Country: 00
    • Show all replies
Re: The ultimate Amiga One (what it should be)
« Reply #3 on: June 02, 2004, 01:18:10 PM »
Quote

daniel_r wrote:
All I want is AmigaOS4 for my pegasos2 ;)

I doubt it is going to happen.  If Amiga Inc went under, it might.