Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: The REAL problem with homo's  (Read 8090 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mikeymike

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 3420
  • Country: 00
    • Show all replies
Re: The REAL problem with homo's
« on: February 19, 2004, 08:25:13 PM »
Anyone who is confused, put your hand up....
 

Offline mikeymike

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 3420
  • Country: 00
    • Show all replies
Re: The REAL problem with homo's
« Reply #1 on: February 19, 2004, 08:47:56 PM »
Your rabbit?

:-?
 

Offline mikeymike

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 3420
  • Country: 00
    • Show all replies
Re: The REAL problem with homo's
« Reply #2 on: February 19, 2004, 09:13:13 PM »
So when's the rabbit called little john thomas?  :-?

 

Offline mikeymike

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 3420
  • Country: 00
    • Show all replies
Re: The REAL problem with homo's
« Reply #3 on: February 19, 2004, 09:15:38 PM »
Too many boogie biscuits?
 

Offline mikeymike

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 3420
  • Country: 00
    • Show all replies
Re: The REAL problem with homo's
« Reply #4 on: February 19, 2004, 09:18:09 PM »
Quote
Not really a rabbit, I was just referring to a term wich is used in the movie 'Monty Pythons' Meaning of Life'

Did the phrase 'john thomas' come from that then?  Haven't seen it.  My brother told me it wasn't very good.
 

Offline mikeymike

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 3420
  • Country: 00
    • Show all replies
Re: The REAL problem with homo's
« Reply #5 on: February 19, 2004, 09:26:39 PM »
I don't suppose you'd mind explaining your first post at some point soon?
 

Offline mikeymike

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 3420
  • Country: 00
    • Show all replies
Re: The REAL problem with homo's
« Reply #6 on: February 19, 2004, 09:28:08 PM »
That's not a particularly informative newsflash!