Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Intel Announces 65nm Breakthrough  (Read 5749 times)

Description:

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline mikeymike

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 3420
  • Country: 00
    • Show all replies
Re: Intel Announces 65nm Breakthrough
« on: September 08, 2004, 11:01:18 PM »
Considering they haven't properly 'broken through' with 90nm technology*, I'm skeptical.

* - leakage problems, much more wasted energy than with previous processors.
 

Offline mikeymike

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 3420
  • Country: 00
    • Show all replies
Re: Intel Announces 65nm Breakthrough
« Reply #1 on: September 09, 2004, 09:26:33 AM »
Quote
Ummm.... what are they at now???

They're at 90nm at the moment, but the Prescott core is a total bar heater (~130W wasted energy when the CPU is being run hard?).  IBM have also been trying to get a 90nm Power5 core out but have been suffering from similar leakage problems.  I haven't heard much about AMD's attempts.

I think the announcement is stockholder candy.
 

Offline mikeymike

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 3420
  • Country: 00
    • Show all replies
Re: Intel Announces 65nm Breakthrough
« Reply #2 on: September 10, 2004, 10:51:07 AM »
There are potential uses for computers that have been put on hold because the processing power hasn't been available.  Some functions can be accomplished in a completely different fashion just because (for example) it can be relied upon for the host machine to have 2GB RAM.

It's not necessarily a case of just getting more eye candy in new software.  It is annoying when that happens, admittedly.

There are other downsides to increased system resources.  Users tend to waste them as well.  The size of the average systray icon collection is increasing with new customers' machines that I see.  The 1GB RAM mark seems to make my life more difficult :-)

I'm sure similar things were said about passing the 100, 200, or 500MHz barriers... "why do we need that much processing capacity?"... "who's going to use this then?".  Sadly, the reason tends to be Windows, rather than increased application capability.  Games seem to be the only real signs of the hardware frontiers being pushed.  I think we're just as unproductive as ever.
 

Offline mikeymike

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 3420
  • Country: 00
    • Show all replies
Re: Intel Announces 65nm Breakthrough
« Reply #3 on: September 13, 2004, 06:44:49 AM »
And of course, the transister count increasing is a bad thing if you're trying to keep down heat wastage and power consumption...