3G iPhone

[Speelgoedmannetje]

Apple sluts! :lol:

[Speelgoedmannetje]

bloodline wrote:

motorollin wrote:

Speelgoedmannetje wrote:
Apple sluts! :lol:

You say that like it's a bad thing ;-)

--
moto

Unfortunately, it's an expensive kind of slut to be...

Indeed, you're no cheap sluts! ;-)

[Speelgoedmannetje]

bloodline wrote:

Can't wait to fire OS2.0 up and see what it does...

Why was I thinking of Workbench 2.0? :lol:

[Speelgoedmannetje]

bloodline wrote:

Speelgoedmannetje wrote:

bloodline wrote:

Can't wait to fire OS2.0 up and see what it does...

Why was I thinking of Workbench 2.0? :lol:

Well, the iPhone is the 21century Amiga...

Making exaggaration an art... :lol:

[Speelgoedmannetje]

cecilia wrote:

motorollin wrote:
Anyone else get one of these beauties today? Bloodline and I both got 16 gig versions :-D

--
moto

so you and Bloodline can walk down the street hand in hand singing??


 :lol:

I'd rather just..... SING!

[Speelgoedmannetje]

I think it's rather Calvinism than communism why we (Odin and I) feel a bit repulsed by buying such expensive gadgets.

[Speelgoedmannetje]

TBH I thought of my Palm M100 to be miggy-like back in 1998 (or something). Inventive, versatile and very easy to use.

[Speelgoedmannetje]

the_leander wrote:

Its Access who own them now, they also own (through the palm deal) BeOS.

I doubt we'll be seeing any releases from Access any time soon tbh. Shame because PalmOS 6 was shaping up to be very, very cool.

Too bad... My Palm M100 was a joy to work with, unfortunately it died. :-(
I've worked for a short time with a Windows PDA (to program a little program in C#), and it's utter SH*TE, it's really, really bad. It punches the user in the face, so bad is it's user unfriendlyness. And with that, it's unreliable.
Anytime I choose an old M100 rather than the newest of the new Windows PDA's.

[Speelgoedmannetje]

quarkx wrote:

bloodline wrote:


It might not be the same, but it is equivalent, the Market is not the same as it was in 1985... And Apple have done exactly what the market wanted.

 :laughing: OMG! "Apple have done what the MARKET Wanted?" I think not! If you do a little research, APPLE did not even build or design the I-phone, but subcontracted everything to HTC. Even your so called MAC OSX is nothing more than BSD re-branded. Apple could have re-launched a brick phone from 1990 and it would have sold EXACTLY the same amount to all the MaC Heads out there. Apple do not re-invent the wheel, they did not do ANYTHING really innovate with the Iphone. It simple was a marketing fad that caught on because of its bling factor. simple
It's only the brain-washed people that cant see the forest for the trees.
APPLE to their credit has a incredible marketing department. and if they launch (or re launch) the newton, it will sell just as many units as the I phones because the MAC heads have to have it.
At the end of the day, it is just a regular piece of technology.simple. This argument is starting to sound like a bunch of crack addicts justifying their addictions.

It's not about technology, it's what they do with it.
The Palm wasn't technology-wise revolutionary either. Though  how you could use it, made it, say, much more useable.