Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: whdload vs. WinUAE for classic Amiga Games  (Read 9147 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Speelgoedmannetje

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 9656
    • Show all replies
Re: whdload vs. WinUAE for classic Amiga Games
« on: June 28, 2006, 10:58:56 AM »
Quote

orange wrote:
Also most PC keyboard cant handle multiple simultaneous keypress.
Bollocks. I use pc keyboard for beat 'em ups BECAUSE I can use multiple buttons at the same time (physically beseen you're right, but in fact one can program around that and that makes the keyboards especially suitable for beat 'em ups). Something I can't do with ordinary joypads/sticks because I'm not that atheltic with my fingers.
And the canary said: \'chirp\'
 

Offline Speelgoedmannetje

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 9656
    • Show all replies
Re: whdload vs. WinUAE for classic Amiga Games
« Reply #1 on: June 28, 2006, 11:35:56 AM »
Quote

Roondar wrote:
What I've noted most in the WinUAE vs Real Amiga comparisoms I did was that the Real Thing (TM) does scroll much smoother.

An Amiga connected to a Amiga monitor or TV scrolls in sync as it should. Somehow WinUAE never manages that*. I didn't actually think about this until quite recently when I noticed how incredibly smooth Shadow of the Beast ran on my A600.

*) That includes when I run NTSC software on a 60Hz screen with Vertical Sync and no lost frames according to WinUAE.

Then I started testing (with a variety of WinUAE settings and yes, on a fast PC with a good GFX card) and found that pretty much all of the smooth scrolling games out there perform better on a real Amiga in that department.

The other thing is that a real digital joystick outperforms a PC joypad/joystick every time for use with an Amiga game. (Mice are a different story offcourse)

Lastly, using a small(ish) TV ironically gives you a 'better' picture than using a high end monitor. (This is offcourse due to the low resolution of the Amiga display which will end up looking more blocky on a monitor than on a small TV)

So, concluding:

Yes, WinUAE is surely faster and more convenient than using a real Amiga (with or without HD).

No, WinUAE does not give the same smoothness for scrolling and missing digital joysticks sucks. Not too mention it always looks more blocky than on a TV  ;-)

(And somehow, even on my PIV 3.2Ghz there are still Amiga programs -mostly those that really bang the hardware- that struggle to reach A500 speeds in WinUAE)
Also, I think the colours are much more crisp than on a PC.
And the canary said: \'chirp\'