Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Pros and Cons of Amithlon type systems  (Read 36369 times)

Description:

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline HeiroglyphTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 1100
    • Show all replies
Re: Pros and Cons of Amithlon type systems
« Reply #14 from previous page: June 10, 2011, 03:20:32 AM »
I don't think 3.9 was that much slower, but I think it feels slower.

Feel is a lot of what makes AmigaOS AmigaOS IMHO.  OS3.9 has this intangible slowness that certain people are more sensitive to.

The multiple reboots are just inexcusable.  I have no idea how that made it out the door.
 

Offline HeiroglyphTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 1100
    • Show all replies
Re: Pros and Cons of Amithlon type systems
« Reply #15 on: June 10, 2011, 09:16:46 AM »
Quote from: EDanaII;643945
Doesn't Haiku have the same limitation that AROS has in regards to drivers? I assume you'd want to support a limited set of architecture first, but wouldn't the ideal be to ultimately support as broad a range of hardware as possible? Am I missing something here?

I have nothing against Haiku and I'm definitely not a Linux fan, but wouldn't you want to start with something that had a fairly broad foundation?

Just curious.


It's not exactly a logical project to work on as much as an emotional one to begin with, but Haiku has surprisingly good hardware support and I like the actual OS.

Haiku is just far more like what I want an updated AOS to be than Linux is.  I'd spend all my time covering up Linux-isms instead of weaving the best of them together.

With Haiku, if it shows through the emulation it's still basically a feature.  Plus I'd rather give my changes back to Haiku and AROS than Linux.

(BTW, I use Linux a lot, I just don't have an emotional attachment there)
 

Offline HeiroglyphTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 1100
    • Show all replies
Re: Pros and Cons of Amithlon type systems
« Reply #16 on: June 13, 2011, 07:37:18 PM »
Quote from: haywirepc;644837
Technically, under the hood beos/haiku is very awesome, but the look and the gui is so but horrible and ugly. If they made it skinnable and allowed you to modify the interface alot, I think it would be alot more usable. Its so horrid ugly. If the gui looked like/worked like amiga os, I'd use it I think.
 
The multitasking/multi-threading is better than anything out there. Its smooth and fast and effecient...


BeOS even came with an Amiga theme if you knew how to enable it.  That's not in Haiku, but it could be easily recreated like the four it currently includes.  (Windows, OSX, BeOS and the standard Haiku theme)

If this project happens I will tweak or replace a lot of things in the Haiku desktop (called Tracker) but not break compatibility with Haiku apps.  No sense not taking advantage of existing BeOS/Haiku apps and development.

I'm doing a huge rework of UAE right now while continuing to look at the feasibility and how much I can get away with being native.  Janus-UAE, although a very cool trick, isn't what I'm planning.  This would be a lot more like Wine or maybe .Net since it needs a VM for the CPU.

Again, don't expect miracles, this will take a long time if it happens.