Not sure it is a false analogy.
The link is showing someone how and where to steal something. I'm thinking quite generically here as I'm personally affected by Copyright theft so my view might be a bit different to most people here.
Don't get me wrong, I think big content providers abuse the copyright laws for their own good... But I want to make it clear that stealing is still stealing regardless of the item being stolen.
I understand where you are coming from and in your case it is theft/loss of income but it can't be considered stealing if nothing has been sold actively for decades. If nobody wants to sell me a brand new Kickstart disk then there is ZERO loss of income and therefore NO THEFT has occurred.
The entire planet is fed up with scum lawyers defending companies hoarding IP with ZERO products for sale. It's the same crap with new Atari I guess too. It all started in the 90s with Nintendo shutting down the Commodore Internet Archive over a fucking tape image for Donkey Kong on C64. Pure SCUM.
Courts should ban copyright claims unless the item is actively sold. END OF ARGUMENT.
(and again do not mention that over priced cock Amiga forever @ me anyone, two scumbags do not make good)
