And i have always wondered why MorphOS/Genesi ppl NEVER focus on their own strenghts.
That is not true. Your statement is not fair. :-(
With a different approach, i believe that they would have attracted a LOT more amiga users than they have now. In fact, this approach from BBRV and employees really is doing more damage than good. I hope they will realise that some day. And it definately is holding me back from buying what seems to be a very decent AmigaOS alternative.
OK, I am biting your bate, I am falling into the trap!
So this is some judgement day, and you are a judge? OK then, go back a year or two in forums and read forward. The Pegasos/MorphOS "supporters" has allways had to fight from below, allways had to defend their alternative way from the allways *so holy* but never available "official" branch. Count the laughs about unstability issues, count the mockery, etc. Why did key MOS/Pegasos people like Ralph Schmidt stop posting on public forums? Posters was burnt, insane personal insults were made, there seemed to be no end to the mockery. Ben Hermans was a key mud slinger. Sources like ann.lu still holds everything intact for the interested. I am sure that you will see that any "aggressive approaches" were only responses to insane aggressions!
Perhaps you don't realize that your "with a different approach" goes the other way around too? Why is people like "Eva" on ann posting with such energy? Isn't it possible that the approach of Ben Hermans&Co scared away people from OS4 too?
However, the Pegasos/MorphOS has **proven their case**, time after time. I have personally owned a Pegasos 1 (april1), a Pegasos 1 (april2), a Pegasos 2, MorphOS1.0-1.4. I have enjoyed that for over a year now, so I know what I am talking about.
The strengths of the Pegasos and MorphOS speaks for itself. No "Fleecy Hype" is needed. Don't pretend otherwise!
