Amiga Inc. back in court

[takemehomegrandma]

This is how I understand things:

1. The Genesi vs. Amiga Inc case is closed. Genesi won.

2. After the cased closed, Genesi filed a "motion to modify order", to "refine" some of the wordings in the ruling. Note, this is NOT a new case, the case is still closed.

3. Now some Amiga Inc related people filed a lot of *responses* to that motion. This is not an appeal, the case is still closed and settled in the same way as before.

Am I right or am I right? ;-)

[takemehomegrandma]

@ Batman

Huh?!?? :-? :-?

Are we talking about the same thing? Are we talking about this:

RESPONSE filed by Defendant Amiga Inc re 49 MOTION to Modify Order Granting Specific Performance (Shukis, Diana) (Entered: 03/15/2004)

... the documents #52 and forward in the Thendic/Genesi vs. Amiga Inc case, the same case that really ended with the Judgement the 20th of February?