Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: What was the Best and "not so good" Amiga Models?  (Read 13146 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline takemehomegrandma

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 2990
    • Show all replies
Re: What was the Best and "not so good" Amiga Models?
« on: September 15, 2003, 04:47:47 PM »
The A600 was IMO pretty meaningless. Something like the C16 and the Plus/4 ...
MorphOS is Amiga done right! :)
 

Offline takemehomegrandma

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 2990
    • Show all replies
Re: What was the Best and "not so good" Amiga Models?
« Reply #1 on: September 15, 2003, 04:59:14 PM »
@ CU_AMiGA

Quote
How far can up upgrade these babies?!


Obviously quite far: http://www.amiga600.de/

 :-o  :-D
MorphOS is Amiga done right! :)
 

Offline takemehomegrandma

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 2990
    • Show all replies
Re: What was the Best and "not so good" Amiga Models?
« Reply #2 on: September 15, 2003, 05:32:15 PM »
@ Indoro

Well, AFAIK the A600 was released after the A1200, but it had much less features. It had a lower price, but that didn't seem to help much. A 020 and some fastmem would have made it faster, but it still lacked the AGA which everyone wanted at that time. That is what I meant with C16 and Plus/4, a downgrade when people asked for upgrades.

I actually have an A600 HD in my closet. I bought it second hand for a project that never come to be. I have not used it much (hmm, perhaps it's time to take it out, blow off the dust, and experience some nostalgia ;-)).

I agree however that it had kind of a cool case. Very small and all ...

The best Amiga made was without doubt the A4000T ...
MorphOS is Amiga done right! :)