Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Teron PX ATX PowerPC motherboard  (Read 21167 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline strobe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 885
    • Show all replies
    • http://216.239.51.100/search?q=cache:7XQQZXN3cS4C:www.amiga.com/corporate/amigadepartypack.shtml
Re: Teron PX ATX PowerPC motherboard
« on: February 05, 2003, 10:40:22 PM »
I always wondered what was the sound a thousand pre-orders being cancelled would make.
 

Offline strobe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 885
    • Show all replies
    • http://216.239.51.100/search?q=cache:7XQQZXN3cS4C:www.amiga.com/corporate/amigadepartypack.shtml
Re: Teron PX ATX PowerPC motherboard
« Reply #1 on: February 06, 2003, 05:09:09 AM »
I don't understand the fourth PCi slot either. I mean who in their right minds would prefer four PCI cards and no AGP instead of three PCI cards and an AGP?

Are people planning on running a machine without a video card? Makes no sense.
 

Offline strobe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 885
    • Show all replies
    • http://216.239.51.100/search?q=cache:7XQQZXN3cS4C:www.amiga.com/corporate/amigadepartypack.shtml
Re: Teron PX ATX PowerPC motherboard
« Reply #2 on: February 07, 2003, 05:55:13 AM »
I'm not a fan of either of these boards. However I will say that built-in firewire has consistently been shown in real world tests to be faster than PCI adaptor cards by a significant margin.

I don't know why that is the case, but it has been.

Anyway hopefully better boards will be on the horizon.
 

Offline strobe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 885
    • Show all replies
    • http://216.239.51.100/search?q=cache:7XQQZXN3cS4C:www.amiga.com/corporate/amigadepartypack.shtml
Re: Teron PX ATX PowerPC motherboard
« Reply #3 on: February 08, 2003, 10:54:50 PM »
Regarding the availability of USB versus Firewire devices, they're really not in the same market since USB 2.0 is so damned slow.

USB is a misnomer anyway, it ought to be called USP. You can daisy chain firewire devices even if the devices have differing speeds provided the slower devices are at the end of the chain. You can't do the same with USB without a hub, unless you want the USB 2.0 devices even slower than before.

USB is more of a replacement for the parallel port than say SCSI.

Most high-end peripherals have a firewire version or are only available as firewire. Most drives have both ports.