9/11 twin towers mysteries documentary.

[TheBilgeRat]

The pure beauty of such a crime is that it is so easily dismissed by people because accepting that agents within your own government did something like this to its own people is too much for most gentle people to comprehend and accept.

[TheBilgeRat]

It also doesn't help their case that the obvious suspects took responsibility for the attack.

You mean the CIA?  :lol:

[TheBilgeRat]

It all comes down to this: Who do you trust more? The Televised vision, or the voices in your head? I'll stick with the voices in my head thank you very much, at least they don't have an agenda.

Until they perfect radio wave manipulation of nerve impulses they don't...

I just got the strangest urge to go buy Palmolive...tough on grease, easy on hands...:eek:




:lol:

[TheBilgeRat]

Oh looky, troofers!

Debunked

As to why people disbelieve "conspiracies", the answer is quite simple: Many us sat through the first wave of this crap and watched as the troofer movement concocted ever more elaborate and unsubstantiated nonsense which basically boiled down to the following:

• Muslims are too stupid to be able to read, much less fly planes (Also it was teh ebul jooos)
• They want star treck to be real (holographic planes, fricken layzeer beams)
• Can't be bothered to take the time to read the NIST report and so make shit up.

Inb4disinfoagent/sheeple

While that is an interesting website, it is by no means a peer reviewed one, unless you take peer to mean like-minded anti-conspiracy conspiracy theorists.

[TheBilgeRat]

From dictionary.com



Or perhaps you're demanding that it be looked at by a member of the landed gentry?

Interesting that you haven't demanded a similar standard of evidence of the OP's video.

Easy, there!  I'm playing devil's advocate, not "Leander's a quack"!  You know darn good and well what a peer reviewed article is.  But the quip about the land owning gentry was pretty funny!  The OPs video is just that, and explained easily enough by your next point (after the adhom quip):

Heh, nice Adhom attack.

I thought that was funny!

There's a reason why stuff like this shows up on youtube, in fact there are a few articles within that site that explain why. Hint: It's the same reason anti-vax and alt-med types use it.

No arguments here on that point.

My point much earlier in the thread was that there is truth somewhere in the middle.  If you are the type that thinks that the US Government is not above questionable acts to justify a war (Lusitania, Gulf of Tonkin, Pearl Harbor, Lend-Lease, Texas Raiders), then let ignorance be your shield.  Was 9/11 an inside job?  Who the hell knows.  We're still arguing about JFK, and our government today has MUCH MORE ability to claim bullshit reasons for "need to know."  Standing on the ground in a Basrah Oilfield protecting a KBR employee while in uniform at the same time Tricky Dick Cheney was assuring the American public that KBR was supplying their own protection -- this KBR employee was telling me that his group was there to build permanent bases for US troops (think Korea) so that we could launch the next part of the operation- carving off the oil fields in Iran.  This was 2003.  So, to recap.  Was Osama CIA?  He was assuredly trained by them.  Were the towers rigged?  Who knows.  Did the US government use that attack to destroy what little civil rights we had left (USA PATRIOT) and go to war to secure oil interests in the middle east?  Absolutely.  So, being a vet of that stupid war, I could care fuck-all about the towers, honestly.

Military deaths to date in Iraq 2003-2011: 4777 (including coalition) +2517 in Afgnaistan.
Source: http://icasualties.org/iraq/index.aspx

Documented civilian death from war action in Iraq, approx 100,000
Source: http://www.iraqbodycount.org/

Approx death from 9/11 (to include first responders exposed to the dust etc)?  2752 (from 2009, so it may have gone up by a couple of deaths)
Source:  http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/16/sept-11-death-toll-rises-by-one-to-2752/