Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Amiga os3.9 vs Windows XP (ram usage)  (Read 8976 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline itix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 2380
    • Show all replies
Re: Amiga os3.9 vs Windows XP (ram usage)
« on: February 29, 2004, 03:00:26 AM »
Yeah, and you just forget XP includes USB stack, DirectX and a decent browser. You also forget XP includes support for nearly all possible printers and Mediaplayer which can do bit more things than Frogger.
My Amigas: A500, Mac Mini and PowerBook
 

Offline itix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 2380
    • Show all replies
Re: Amiga os3.9 vs Windows XP (ram usage)
« Reply #1 on: February 29, 2004, 03:03:35 AM »
Quite funny you are running AmigaOS 3.9 in Windows... Why not run AmigaOS without Windows? Now your AmigaOS needs 40MB + 200MB (Windows). How bloated is that :-P
My Amigas: A500, Mac Mini and PowerBook
 

Offline itix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 2380
    • Show all replies
Re: Amiga os3.9 vs Windows XP (ram usage)
« Reply #2 on: February 29, 2004, 07:37:28 AM »
Quote

Plus, efficiency is something lacking in Microsoft products.


Apparently efficient enough to run WinUAE...
My Amigas: A500, Mac Mini and PowerBook
 

Offline itix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 2380
    • Show all replies
Re: Amiga os3.9 vs Windows XP (ram usage)
« Reply #3 on: February 29, 2004, 07:33:26 PM »
Quote

But I'm not sure why having support for nearly all printers is usable in defense of requiring so many resources just to boot the OS. Why would any efficient OS, by default, load drivers for printers at startup?


The point was that Windows offers lot more functionality than AmigaOS 3 (or OS4/MOS for that matter) ever could. You can make comparisons how much less IBrowse needs than IE, but then IE can do CSS and Java and everything else. And compared to mother of bloat, Mozilla, IE is actually very efficient. I also wonder how well laser printers are supported in AmigaOS 3.9 or if it is possible to use network printers. Or use file sharing even. And what else.

Quote

And don't defend it by saying 'it's an OS, it's very complex'. Bull. MS has a staff of a least, what ,say 100 people? Get rid of the bugs! Make it less prone to crashes! (BEFORE you release another version...)


Point me an AmigaOS version which was bug free.

(No, I don't think Windows is the best OS. I've been told VMS is the best OS ever, but without further clarification I cannot confirm that.)
My Amigas: A500, Mac Mini and PowerBook
 

Offline itix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 2380
    • Show all replies
Re: Amiga os3.9 vs Windows XP (ram usage)
« Reply #4 on: February 29, 2004, 07:47:39 PM »
Quote

...barely, and I mean just barely on a 2Ghz processor. Everything else I multitask with WinUAE crawls to a standstill, and in some cases that'll take money off my paycheck.


Sorry but today so called true Amigans seem to be WinUAE users. Nothing wrong in that, but Windows can't be that bad then.
My Amigas: A500, Mac Mini and PowerBook