Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: lame benchmarks (pun intended)  (Read 21884 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rebraist

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 54
    • Show all replies
Re: lame benchmarks (pun intended)
« on: February 02, 2012, 08:42:03 PM »
this test is no good!
how can pasemi make 18 seconds with altivec and 18 seconds with altivec off?
for the same reason a g4 makes 36 sec without altivec and 17 seconds with altivec?
it does mean that x1000 benchmark are simply and totally without altivec in both cases!
edit: test says it's altivec enabled in both tests... so really my g4 is faster than an x1000?
and what about an x1000 without altivec?
« Last Edit: February 02, 2012, 08:46:59 PM by rebraist »
I\'m not an heretic: an heretic is a morphos user! I\'m a perverted: i\'m an aros user!
edit:...i\'m now an heretic perverted... i\'m a morpharosian...
Evil has no limits... I\'ve even os4.1 too...
Is there in my house any space to sleep still?