Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: X1000 looking good on paper?  (Read 35663 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rebraist

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 54
    • Show all replies
Re: X1000 looking good on paper?
« on: October 15, 2010, 08:34:06 PM »
the two photos (they're clearly two) are taken from slightly different point of view. They could be taken even in two different moments. It's evident the difference in light (perhaps it could be the flash in the first to make a more complete tonal composition).
What it's not so obvious is that i wouldn't bet for sure that under paper there's nothing.
The second photo, is not in the same perspective so it can be used as a direct confrontation.
What does that machine mean?
The only one that can say this is the people who's taken the photos.
I think it'a convenction: in the first photo there's a badge on the case.
The hardpaper box on the table is linked to silicon sonic catweasel (the same box i have for catweasel). Does anyone know if in any convenction aeon used catweasel for x1000?
I'm an aros supporter so...
If x1000 isn't a rocket, apple machines are really really sad machines... the newest x86.
the old ppc ones are really really worse.
At least mr dickinson has two good things:
1) put his own face and money in what he believes.
2) he has the same surname as the iron maiden singer.
Up the irons.
Que viva aros.. er.. amiga!!
I\'m not an heretic: an heretic is a morphos user! I\'m a perverted: i\'m an aros user!
edit:...i\'m now an heretic perverted... i\'m a morpharosian...
Evil has no limits... I\'ve even os4.1 too...
Is there in my house any space to sleep still?