It is misleading: two or three people here already got wrong because of that. Unless you're really into technical stuff, you'll interpret it as supporting (adding) 24bit in AGA. Weather it was done on purpose or not is left to the appreciation of everyone (I wouldn't be surprised it was).
This is getting silly. First of all, the description is perfectly accurate, and there's hardly any other way to put it. Secondly, why on earth would Jens&Co want to create so much trouble for themselves by doing false marketing, as you suggest? It's a scandoubler/flickerfixer - if some people dont know what that is, that is _their_ problem. Maybe they also think that if you watch "plan9 from outter space" on a new 50+ inch LED TV, it will suddenly be in colours? After all, it is a colour TV, right?
Adding something like "full-AGA support, including HAM8 modes (HighGFX HAM8 supported)" would be ok as I see it.
That would not be an accurate enough description, would it?
Nowhere does it claim to be a graphics card.
Nowhere does it claim to add 24bit screenmodes.
Nowhere does it claim to make the graphics faster.
Nowhere does it claim to make the machine faster.
Nowhere does it claim to make your penis bigger.
It's just a scandoubler/flickerfixer with 24bit output.
