Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Cell CPU as the next thing?  (Read 12604 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline commodorejohn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 3165
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.commodorejohn.com
Re: Cell CPU as the next thing?
« on: August 27, 2012, 08:07:50 PM »
I'm not an expert on the matter, but Cell strikes me as one of those things like Itanium where it's just too damn complicated to bother with. Software-directed caching sounds good in theory, and if you're willing to tweak it properly I'm sure it can run very well indeed, but for normal software development, you'd need a pretty freaking smart compiler to make the most of it.

Besides, FPU performance is only one small part of overall system performance.
Computers: Amiga 1200, DEC VAXStation 4000/60, DEC MicroPDP-11/73
Synthesizers: Roland JX-10/MT-32/D-10, Oberheim Matrix-6, Yamaha DX7/FB-01, Korg MS-20 Mini, Ensoniq Mirage/SQ-80, Sequential Circuits Prophet-600, Hohner String Performer

"\'Legacy code\' often differs from its suggested alternative by actually working and scaling." - Bjarne Stroustrup
 

Offline commodorejohn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 3165
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.commodorejohn.com
Re: Cell CPU as the next thing?
« Reply #1 on: August 28, 2012, 07:22:24 PM »
Saying something outperforms a Pentium IV is not saying much at all. Pentium IIIs outperform P4s, clock-for-clock. There's a reason Intel dropped Netburst completely and went back to the P3 as the basis for designing the Core architecture.
Computers: Amiga 1200, DEC VAXStation 4000/60, DEC MicroPDP-11/73
Synthesizers: Roland JX-10/MT-32/D-10, Oberheim Matrix-6, Yamaha DX7/FB-01, Korg MS-20 Mini, Ensoniq Mirage/SQ-80, Sequential Circuits Prophet-600, Hohner String Performer

"\'Legacy code\' often differs from its suggested alternative by actually working and scaling." - Bjarne Stroustrup