Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Kickrom 3.5 rev.40.71  (Read 7330 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Doobrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 1876
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.doobreynet.co.uk
Re: Kickrom 3.5 rev.40.71
« on: May 16, 2007, 07:24:03 PM »
Quote

Piru wrote:
KS 40.71 (attributed to Amiga Technologies) is a fake.


Yup, that fake 40.71 is a slightly hacked 40.70 A4000(D) ROM.
Nothing more than a few changes to some strings, and a version bump.
 
On schedule, and suing
 

Offline Doobrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 1876
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.doobreynet.co.uk
Re: Kickrom 3.5 rev.40.71
« Reply #1 on: May 16, 2007, 07:41:47 PM »
Quote

DonnyEMU wrote:
 I think this was put together for a technology demo of prototype hardware that was never release (that amiga that looked like a toaster box I believe).

If you want the real story on it, load it up and start looking at the libraries that are resident with it. It's quite interesting from that perspective.


Are you thinking of the v43 ROMs that were in the Walker prototypes?
On schedule, and suing
 

Offline Doobrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 1876
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.doobreynet.co.uk
Re: Kickrom 3.5 rev.40.71
« Reply #2 on: May 26, 2007, 02:06:11 PM »
@Kin-Hell

 There's no relationship between the kickstart version and the machine it's made for.
eg. There was a 40.70 for the A4000D, but it had problems with scsi.device when used with some CPU cards, so they dropped back to 40.68

IIRC, there was a similar situation with the A3000 too.
On schedule, and suing
 

Offline Doobrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 1876
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.doobreynet.co.uk
Re: Kickrom 3.5 rev.40.71
« Reply #3 on: May 26, 2007, 08:25:29 PM »
Quote

Donar wrote:
The video was taken down by the author because of causing trouble with AInc/Reedsmith because they thought the author had really manipulated their ROM's/Kickstart Disk - infringing their copyright in their POV.


I was told their complaint was 'manipulation of copy protection'
Since there's no copy protection in the ROM or the 3.5/3.9 ROMUpdate files,I'd love to see Amiga Inc try and prove that one in court.
On schedule, and suing