Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: OS4 rollout schedule  (Read 35515 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SidMan

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Sep 2002
  • Posts: 88
    • Show all replies
Re: OS4 rollout schedule
« on: June 18, 2003, 12:31:56 AM »
@Dietmar



Companies need to make money, and in a market where we can't count on mass sales (unlike the PC clone and Microsoft markets) there has to be some give. The license fee for a hardware producer to run an OS is perfectly viable. I'm sure hardware phone manufacturers have to pay certain royalties for using an OS on their system.

At the end of the day the only current license for new PPC based OS4 systems is Eyetech's Amiga One. If YOUR REQUIRED OS wont run on on your PREFERRED hardware then I can only say that you purchased the wrong board.

If you bought a board to run operating system X, and then Y comes out requiring the manufacturer to pay a fee for use on the system, then you need to talk to the hardware manufacturer. If this cannot be resolved then you need to rethink, or hope that the manufacturer comes to some agreement (ie: pays the fee).

Don't get me wrong I want to see AOS everywhere, but business is money and without money we won't see AOS anywhere.


 

Offline SidMan

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Sep 2002
  • Posts: 88
    • Show all replies
Re: OS4 rollout schedule
« Reply #1 on: June 18, 2003, 07:03:02 PM »
@grandma

It's a starting point.
 

Offline SidMan

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Sep 2002
  • Posts: 88
    • Show all replies
Re: OS4 rollout schedule
« Reply #2 on: June 18, 2003, 11:38:45 PM »
@TMHGrandma

I suggest you listen to Alan Redhouse's (Eyetech) latest presentation he did, the link was posted here again some days ago. He has plans for pushing OS4 with existing and future boards into certain market areas, thus expanding the user base. It's all in the presentation - well worth a good look / listen.

Mirrors of downloads here : http://paula.tidstrand.com/
 
Regarding the second half of your post my views were expressed near the beginning of this Topic (Page 1 or 2).