So you are suggesting that people should stop tinkering with devices if the manufactorer disapproves. Right?
No. did you finish reading my sentences? Microsoft is hardly overjoyed that people are hacking its Kinect device to do weird effects with, I think thats ok, hell I have a driver on my pc that lets me use my ps3 web cam and joypad if i like. Hacking these kind of device to be used on other machine I dont really have a problem with. The problem I have with this is it clearly going to used by the majority of people to get free games.
The opening of the PS3 hardware might have many consequences that collides with Sony's business idea for the PS3. Such as third party operating systems, improved media center functionality (at last), games being developed outside Sony's ecosphere etc. just like we've seen on the other consoles that have been opened.
You got to admit though that piracy is the big one. Plus I will say it again if you not happy by what is offered by Sony, buy an alternative product. Hell at the moment I use my ps3 as my media hub, but it just doesn't support all the media files I want it to and it web browser is pretty poor (still glad it has one) this is why I decided to build my own media center pc this year so I wont have any of these problems.
A totally irrelevant comment, noone is forcing anything and the "closed" IP system only appeared to be closed. On closer inspection it was not closed at all, perhaps it was intended to be closed, but in the end it was wide open.
Highlighted the problem for you, it was intended to be closed weather it was or not is irrelevant, sony didn't intend to let this happen. Plus still to run unapproved software you are going to have to copy Sonys key, weather you like it or not, that key is a Sony code so by copying or misusing it your are breaking the law.
Why not? That's what one pay for, right? Now you can decide for yourself what needs you have and run whatever firmware you like, it is how it should have been from the start from a customers POV.
Well technically you get what you pay for is right, meaning if Sony sold you a fat PS3 with firmware v1 that is all your technically entitled to, Sony doesn't have to provide updates to any user who doesn't agree with any new end user agreement they make. Plus if your happy with what you paid for why do you feel the need to hack it and allow it to do more that what it said it could do, why not just buy a machine that lets you do what you want it to do. after all the "limited" features of the ps3 is all you paid for, right? why do you think you should be entitled to more than what you paid for, the main reason PS3 is cheaper than what it should be is due to the fact Sony get a nice % on anything you buy for it.If you dont agree with that system then your should be buying a computer.
I really don't understand your agenda in this discussion
Well I'm going to call it a day in this discussion because i dont want to be seen as a fan boy, or a troll or a supporter of DRM and copyright crap, I'm not at all.
The main reason I posted was because I didn't like the general attitude of some people saying that:
Sony 100% deserves this, (they where the only game console that did allow and supported linux on it to begin with, so they dont, but thats just my view.)
That its was only done to get Linux back on it (again no one forced you to upgrade firmware, and linux if far better on other devices...like a computer would you believe! Again just my point of view)
and that it ok to pirate the games and get them for free (ok no one said that last one, but I'm pretty sure thats what a lot of people are thinking.)